Skip to content

Conversation

AlexandreCarlton
Copy link
Collaborator

This is more symmetric with MappedBatchLoader and preserves efficiency; we do not need to emit a Map.Entry for duplicate keys (given the strong intention that this will be used to create a Map).

This was picked up after creating README examples, which have also been added here.

This is more symmetric with `MappedbatchLoader` and preserves
efficiency; we do not need to emit a `Map.Entry` for duplicate keys
(given the strong intention that this will be used to create a `Map`).
Copy link
Member

@bbakerman bbakerman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice one

@bbakerman bbakerman merged commit c3e6ee5 into graphql-java:reactive-streams-branch May 26, 2024
@dondonz dondonz added this to the 3.4.0 milestone Dec 16, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants